I'm a Dedicated Capitalist, But Medicare for All Is the Best Hope for US Healthcare

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly

According to recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because political disagreements regarding subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income pays approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I know multiple businesses that are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When you add these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for small businesses which hire the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.

Arthur Chavez
Arthur Chavez

A tech journalist and software developer with over a decade of experience covering emerging technologies and digital trends.